The central authorities is considering a proposal for revision of the income criteria for determining the creamy layer among different backward lessons (OBCs).
In his reply to a query within the Lok Sabha on Tuesday, Minister of State (MOS) for Social Justice and Empowerment Krishan Pal Gurjar stated the proposal was made after due session with the Nationwide Fee for the Backward Courses (NCBC).
“A proposal for revision of the income criteria for determining the creamy layer amongst OBCs is into consideration of the federal government,” Krishan Pal Gurjar stated.
In response to one other query within the Decrease Home of Parliament, the MoS for Social Justice and Empowerment Rattan Lal Kataria stated, “A committee was constituted to make in-depth evaluation of the explanations for non-filling up of reserved vacancies/much less employability of Scheduled Castes (SCs), Scheduled Tribes (STs), Different Backward Courses (OBCs) and Individuals with Disabilities (PwDs) in authorities sector and counsel remedial measures.”
That is consistent with the assertion by Social Justice and Empowerment Minister Thawar Chand Gehlot in December of final 12 months. Gehlot had stated that the Centre will improve the income ceiling restrict for creamy layer of OBCs very quickly.
In September of final 12 months, the federal government had knowledgeable Parliament that an skilled committee headed by BP Sharma to look at the problems associated to creamy layer equivalence among the socially and educationally backward lessons (SEBCs) had submitted its report which was into consideration.
The income ceiling restrict for creamy layer among the socially and educationally backward lessons (SEBCs) is raised each three years. The final improve got here in 2017 and the federal government had introduced a rise within the restrict in early 2020.
Earlier than the Narendra Modi authorities got here to energy, the gross annual income benchmark for the willpower of backwardness was raised from Rs 4.5 lakh to Rs 6 lakh underneath UPA rule in 2013. It was in September of 2017 that the BJP-led NDA authorities hiked the restrict to Rs 8 lakh.
In 2017, the federal government in an try to ship a political sign to the numerous OBC vote had legislated a constitutional standing to the Nationwide Fee for Backward Courses. The Centre had additionally determined to arrange a fee underneath Part 340 of the Structure, to sub-categorise the OBCs in order that the extra “under-privileged” among them can avail the advantage of reservation for authorities jobs and seats in instructional establishments.
Nevertheless, the Centre in 2020 determined to take into account the bigger query of how to calculate income or particularly whether or not wage must be included in annual income computation.
The problem was then referred to a bunch of ministers led by Defence Minister Rajnath Singh. The Group of Ministers (GoM) later really useful that wage must be taken under consideration whereas computing the annual income. The concept was to plug the advantages loved by a “creamy layer” and convey extra OBCs, particularly in rural areas, underneath the quota regime. Nevertheless, the Nationwide Fee for Backward Courses raised a pink flag towards the transfer.
Sensing that the transfer may displease the highly effective OBC vote financial institution forward of the Bihar Meeting polls, the Centre had determined to defer the choice.
Now, the Cupboard is predicted to take a name on each the problems collectively – income computation and creamy layer announcement.
The proposal, in accordance to sources, is to improve the creamy layer criteria from Rs 8 lakh to Rs 12 lakh.
Below the present legal guidelines, OBCs are entitled to 27 per cent quota in greater instructional establishments and public sector employment. The rider for the quota is that the gross annual income of the mother and father of an applicant shouldn’t exceed Rs 8 lakh. Any individual from the OBC neighborhood whose mother and father have an annual income of Rs 8 lakh and above is classed as “creamy layer” and isn’t eligible for the quota.